As far as aggression concerns, it uses to be unsuitable and bad most of the time and only less often suitable and good.
As a rule, excessive aggression uses to be generally and consistently condemned. And one of the main goals of human society is to get rid of it.
Let give us a question: "What are the reasons for aggression?"
If we do not consider spiritual and energetic reasons and will see it with a purely practical and human viewpoint, then we find the need of self-preservation and self-safety as the main reason for aggression.
The cause of aggression is either an immediately-threatening (attack-like) or a possible danger (when someone will be too gentle, people can rob him of his girlfriend, money etc.) and the aggression is used to eliminate or ward it off.
Personally, I would divide the aggression into the two main kinds:
1) Defensive aggression - aggression used for defensive purposes to divert some actually-threatening danger.
2) Expansive aggression - searching for conflicts and attacking the other for self-enforcement and to divert a potentially-threatening danger only.
Now I would want to call the attention to the fact, how a total suppressing of any aggression may do harm and may indirectly cause an aggression much more worse than the originally-suppressed-one.
For example, somebody is restricted and hurted by other people and always suppresses his aggression towards them, steps back and does not defend, but the suppressed aggression inside of him is gathering and growing and will begin to do harm to him gradually (sometimes, it can not be more visible until long years). It will gradually put his state of health out of order and it may result in an inner emotional over-pressure that can later be the cause for his “explosion” and a sudden attack - even because of some trivial reason - for example a relative, landanimal or some unguilty man. In this case, he is giving the innocent the blows, which deserves another person who often has not got a single one. In the end, through this behavior the man will cause much more of evil than what he would cause if he was not suppressing his suppressed aggression and would discharge it on his real aggressors and would keep his health, good nerves and good behavior to those who are worth of it.
So who is harmed and does not defend himself, he experiences a powerless hate and suppresses his aggression. And by the course of time, he either falls ill and causes a pain not only to himself but also to those who love him, or he releases the emotional over-pressure by beating someone innocent. Or the both. And if he would never mind the total suppression of his aggression and the totally submissive role, then he would not be a man in the right meaning of the word, because there must be a little bit of energy, human dignity and latent aggression in every proper man.
Let's try to calculate the positive and negative impact of suppression of defensive aggression, and contrariwise it's using:
We can say that to beat the aggressor who uses to attack you has a relatively positive value and to beat him who does not use to attack you has a relatively negative value. Now, using a simple example, we will make a calculation of how it can look like when someone permits his attacking without defending himself and does not do anything about his being hurted and then uses to pourish his wrath on the innocent:
Somebody is three times attacked by the aggressor and does not defend - thereby he more or less supports the aggressor in his no-good behavior. So we could count it as -3 points. But nobody is only bad and possibly the aggressor it two-thirdy bad, so we will count it as -2 points. The attacked suppresses his aggression and then explodes at home and is in a big quarrel 10x and hurts his relative through this. And perhaps he or she was two-thirdy good so we will count each quarrel as two-thirdy of the point, that is -0,66 point. So that by no-defending himself, the attacked committed a bad deed of -8,6 points value (-0,66 x 10 = -6,6 - 2 = -8,6).
However, if the man on the contrary defended himself as soon as the first attack of the “two-thirdy bad aggressor” and would overpower and beat him, then he would perform a deed with +0,66 point value. And after that the aggressor would possibly be afraid to attack other people again and would cease (another plus), or on the contrary would pourish his wrath on them (minus).
[If the attacked would however beat the aggressor totally which is not possible to be done legally because the law almost never allows it, then the aggressor could not attack any other man (a big plus) but it would cause a pain to those who loved him (minus). But, most of the time, violent aggressors are not so-much loved by other people.]
So the number could finally be quite different, but to make it simple, let it be as it is. Moreover, the attacked would discharge his anger and would preserve his health by defending himself and beating the aggressor, and possibly would treat his relative little better for some time than normally (when a man discharges his aggression, then he is kinder and more calm for some while). So through the efficient defense, the attacked would perform a good deed of several points value.
Of course, these numbers were made simplified and partially wrong in view of all-present relativity, but they indicate what seems to be better or worse.
To be able to use healthy and reasonable aggression in reasonable extend, one must be in a certain position and circumstances, which enable it for him:
1) He must be physically and mentally above-averagely strong = enough healthy and with basic skillness in martial arts or with some experiences from street fights.
2) He must not be too poor and financially dependent on others who then have him in their “handful”, and, eventually, he has to let them humiliate him.
3) He must have the favor of Fate in his actions.
Lesson:
If you will always step back from and never fight back a merciless aggressor, he will attack you and other people further. When you will beat him a little, he could then be in rage and revenge himself, either on you or on others. However, when you would beat him totally - knocked him down and trampled him under your feet, then you will break and destroy him and he would then stop attacking the other.
Therefore if you handle a really bad, merciless aggressive man, it would be suitable to liquidate him totally. Remember: „A kind treatment only works in some people, whereas a violent treatment works in all people!“
To recognize if the aggressor is really very bad and merciless, first you would have to see his aura and have to have enough time and wisdom to investigate him, which is not fully possible in practice because of the two main reasons:
1) When a quickly-happening conflict, there is not enough time for it.
2) Hardly any fighter is a priest, a philosopher, a senzibil and an expert on people in one person, so hardly any is able to judge if he really met a really merciless and bad aggressor.
In addition, the law - in most circumstances - does not allow the violent liquidation of violent aggressors.
How to reconcile oneself with a possible lost or nobody can be always winning:
Further it is suitable to improve oneself in the sense of being able to get over a possible lost and other unpleasant circumstances or injustices of life, since nobody can always win. If you fail in your defense against the attacker or if somebody did something to you and you did not revenge to him and you always think about it and keep hate and hatred in you, which keeps your discomposure and emotional over-pressure, then you must learn to stop thinking about it, restore your inner peace and take the respective injustice as much positively as possible and turn it into your benefit:
1) Take a lesson from it to be wiser than before.
2) By experiencing the unjustice, you attoned some negative Karma of your soul.
Anyway, in such a case you are provided three important advices by Prof. Dr. Josef Velenovsky:
1) If you have got an angriness-attack, never do anything since your action may be fatal for you. If an unhappiness falls on you, if you suffer a damage on your possession and are affected by a poisoned arrows of unfriendly rumors, be enough with the already-made damage and stay or return to your inner peace as soon as possible to prevent any increasing of the damage by additional loss of health and condition of your spirit.
2) The more someone keeps a calm mind and deliberation in hard and dangerous moments, the more he is perfect and more easily faces any enemy and any danger.
3) If I am attacked by an enemy, I try to divert his attacks by kindness and friendly attitude for the first and to make anything at all to convince him about my love and peaceful intentions and divert him from doing of evil. When the enemy however refuses my endeavors and continues in his attempts to destroy me, then I must step up on the proper defense to save me or a good work that I do for the progress of mankind.
The nonsense of expansive aggression:
For ever and ever, the same foolish scenario is repeating:
Some soul hurts the other soul and then, for a change, the other soul hurts the soul, which hurted it. One time the soul is a weaker, another time a stronger man and this way round and round and round, while no power saves it from being the less strong again, after it was the stronger.
There is but one solution how to get rid of this always-repeating weakness: „Never be the too strong neither the too weak. It is only possible when all will be in similar condition and one equal to the other. The only way is when we all will renounce any expansive aggression and desire to dominate over other people.“
Suppression of expansive aggression:
As for the suppression and non-suppression of aggression, only the expansive aggression should be suppressed and defensive aggression not.
Because of the reason of minimisation of one's expansive aggression, it is suitable for a fighter to keep away from such an environment where conflicts are occurring most and to stop desiring to fight other people. Let him be strong enough to handle things if they once come to pass against his will, but at the same time let him keep away from it as much as possible. It means to avoid “aggressive places” - police, army, “sharper night clubs” and similarly. Simply to avoid everything, where the adept consciously and actively enters an aggressive role.
*******
Aggressive behavior, in the form of physical attack, above all, is caused by these three main factors:
1) Spiritually and physically inheritted aggression.
2) Influences of bad education, that is the development of aggression by other people.
3) Influence of bad spirits.
The influence of inheritted aggression and bad educational influences can be reduced by re-construction of human society, in which any displayed aggression will be minimized and decreased gradually. Worse it is about the influence of bad spirits, of course, whose actions have catastrophic consequences. For example, I personally do know one of those evil spirits, who arrange a sudden occurring of angriness-attacks - assail and beating of somebody else. I call him “Flayer” because he uses to enter people to attack and beat other people through them, most often using fist-punches to the face. He is grey, no hair and no beard, with angry expression in his primitive evil face and eyes. He is the explosion of anger and terrible blows with fists.
For a change, another bad spirit that I call "Fuellinger" will enter you and will take a deep breath inside of you and you will suddenly start being angry and aggressive, or "Spoiler" who will make you cease liking of the other and will force you to see his bad side only. There is a long range of such evil beings.
When human society will re-construct itself one day to remove excessive aggression from it, then the influence of evil ghosts must be destroyed as well, who use to attack ones through the others. This can be reached by two ways:
1. Directly = to attack their negative parallel world and destroy it by Holy Energy - burn it gradually. It however is not possible in practice so far, because we would have to a) see the parallel world, b) have the Holy Energy at our disposal and c) be allowed by allmighty Fate to do that.
2. Indirectly = to create such an environment in people to make there no place for these evil spirits to enter by a) birth under the astrologic influences that are restricting aggressive behavior (people will not be allowed to be born under some negative constellations = controlled pregnancy; if somebody would be proved to have excessive, genetically-inheritable aggressive endowments, he would not be allowed to have children), b) putting to sleep the people who have excessive aggressive endowments in them (before the death, they should feel sorry about it and should die with the help of a priest to decrease those endowments in the future lives of their souls) and c) by global connection to the highest spiritual world to give people love and peace and to restrict the influence of the bad spirits evocating aggressive behavior in people.
Keeping of defensive aggression:
If we remove excessive aggression and would keep the defensive one only, then we should take care of it's efficiency too. To reach that, let us mention it's main weakness first:
Defensive aggression usually allows to be hit or strongly held as the first, and only then it starts to defend - often when it is already too late. Therefore it is necessary to train the following:
- the power of resistence against strikes (it increases the ability to bear the opponent's punch)
- keeping of suitable, defensive position at all circumstances, above all sufficient distance from a potential opponent (to minimise the probability of being unexpectedly hit; it also enables you to block the punch of your opponent, make a step aside, defend or run away)
- good judgement of character (the estimation of people or of the danger of attack respectively that could eventually threaten to you)
In conclusion, a couple of words on the global minimisation of aggression:
The solution to the global minimisation of aggression consists, above all, in the removal of a danger owing to which some people endangers other people whether immediately or only potentially. If the danger would disappear, the reason for aggression would disappear together with it too (with an exception to genetic endowments for aggression - those would however decrease in human population by the course of time, since gradual decreasing of aggression would be inserted into the genofond of mankind).
